.
This time I used a very loose definition and also list some inactive blogs. Swiss and Austrian blogs were also included this time. The definition of "blog" in use was furthermore rather loose:
The usual bloggers are former generals, politicians, journalists or political scientists.
S O
.
Entradas populares
-
This is an introduction to the site " MILITARY FUTURE WEAPONS ". Here you can have a better view and a bigger picture on the futu...
-
List of modern weapons by country Austria Glock series of semi-automatic pistols Steyr M series of semi-automatic pistols Steyr AUG assault...
-
Type: Assault rifle Place of origin: Germany, United States Production history Designed: 2002 Manufacturer: Heckler & Koch Produced: 20...
-
There are essentially three facets to classifying weapon types: who uses it, how it works, and what it targets. Who uses it essentially det...
-
. Fall Blau (case blue) was the title of the Axis summer offensive of 1942 on the Eastern Front. Historical advance of the axis forces as p...
-
Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page. View the original article here
-
List of all weapons currently in development, production, or significant service in the world 2A42 30 mm autocannon from Russia9K38 Igla Ru...
-
In modern warfare, since all redoubts are traps, maneuver and coordination of forces is decisive, overshadowing particular weapons. The goa...
-
The XM307 Advanced Crew Served Weapon (ACSW) is a developmental 25 mm belt-fed Grenade Machine Gun with smart shell capability. It is the r...
-
The Objective Individual Combat Weapon (OICW) is the lethality element of the Land Warrior program. It is also planned to be fielded as a s...
jueves, 19 de mayo de 2011
Internet censorship in Germany: Agreement on rollback
.
The German federal government (cabinet) decided back in 2009 that internet censorship should be introduced to block certain internet contents (supposedly only child porn) in Germany.Critics pointed out that this was(a) entirely unnecessary because the German executive could simply wake up and ask the providers to delete the content for good - with great chance of success,(b) it was ineffective because even children were able to circumvent the proposed censorship and(c) it was a dangerous step towards censorship that would lay the groundwork for autocratic government by building both acceptance for their methods and build their tools.It was also pointed out that such blacklists from other countries are extremely crappy; outdated and blocking lots of legal content.
A citizen petition of 134,000 people was ignored and the ruling coalition created the law in the parliament, but the government (not the responsible minister) was uncomfortable with it. The next elections yielded a different ruling coalition and they agreed to not execute this law, not to introduce the censorship.This agreement was rather questionable as well, treating an effective law as something lesser than a mere coalition agreement detail. The parliament's president - in theory ranked higher even than the chancellor - criticised this recently.The minister who was responsible for the stupid law had long ago moved to another ministry and had apparently lost enough political capital by now.Finally, it turned out that simple work without any specific law enables policemen to delete 93% of the identified child porn sites within two weeks and 99% within four weeks. The mere censorship would not have achieved any such thing; all perverts would have been easily able to get past the utterly useless "warning sign" censorship wall. Meanwhile, seven billion people could still have reached the porn.Well, there has been another cabinet-level decision; the shitty and 100% useless law will be rolled back soon. The members of parliament should ask themselves why the heck the gubernative is deciding such things and delegating merely the execution of legislation to the legislative, but this time it's at least about a good move.
The government has understood that it moved too quickly into a direction that too many Germans consider to be questionable if not dangerous. Our Chancellor Merkel has proved in the last few years that she's capable of changing course - probably not the least because politics is for her most likely almost entirely about power and only marginally about ideology or conservatism.This flexibility is at times a good thing, for some of those corrections have been rather good ideas.
S O
The German federal government (cabinet) decided back in 2009 that internet censorship should be introduced to block certain internet contents (supposedly only child porn) in Germany.Critics pointed out that this was(a) entirely unnecessary because the German executive could simply wake up and ask the providers to delete the content for good - with great chance of success,(b) it was ineffective because even children were able to circumvent the proposed censorship and(c) it was a dangerous step towards censorship that would lay the groundwork for autocratic government by building both acceptance for their methods and build their tools.It was also pointed out that such blacklists from other countries are extremely crappy; outdated and blocking lots of legal content.
A citizen petition of 134,000 people was ignored and the ruling coalition created the law in the parliament, but the government (not the responsible minister) was uncomfortable with it. The next elections yielded a different ruling coalition and they agreed to not execute this law, not to introduce the censorship.This agreement was rather questionable as well, treating an effective law as something lesser than a mere coalition agreement detail. The parliament's president - in theory ranked higher even than the chancellor - criticised this recently.The minister who was responsible for the stupid law had long ago moved to another ministry and had apparently lost enough political capital by now.Finally, it turned out that simple work without any specific law enables policemen to delete 93% of the identified child porn sites within two weeks and 99% within four weeks. The mere censorship would not have achieved any such thing; all perverts would have been easily able to get past the utterly useless "warning sign" censorship wall. Meanwhile, seven billion people could still have reached the porn.Well, there has been another cabinet-level decision; the shitty and 100% useless law will be rolled back soon. The members of parliament should ask themselves why the heck the gubernative is deciding such things and delegating merely the execution of legislation to the legislative, but this time it's at least about a good move.
The government has understood that it moved too quickly into a direction that too many Germans consider to be questionable if not dangerous. Our Chancellor Merkel has proved in the last few years that she's capable of changing course - probably not the least because politics is for her most likely almost entirely about power and only marginally about ideology or conservatism.This flexibility is at times a good thing, for some of those corrections have been rather good ideas.
S O
edit: Related: http://www.boingboing.net/2011/03/31/britains-back-room-n.html bad news from the UK.
.
Suscribirse a:
Entradas (Atom)